alles over ongeneeslijke ziektes

Living longer in good health

Intergenerational interventions and their impact on active aging: A systematic review.

5 Repeated evidence

What this means for you: this is established.
Type of study
meta-analysis or systematic review
Studied in
people
Participants
not stated in the abstract
Published
2026 in International psychogeriatrics
Cited
4 times by other research
Who paid
Not declared. PubMed carries no conflict-of-interest statement for most articles; that is not the same as independent.
Source
PubMed 40914710 · doi 10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100142
The plain-language write-up of this study is still being written. Below is the abstract exactly as the researchers published it.
Abstract by the researchers — original text

BACKGROUND: The aging of the world's population has led to a growing need for innovative strategies to promote active aging and bridge generational divides. Intergenerational Programs (IGPs) that engage young adults (18-30 years) and older adults (65 + years) have demonstrated the potential to improve well-being and reduce ageism. However, the evidence for this pairing of ages is still fragmentary. This review aims to provide a qualitative and systematic synthesis of present IGPs, deepening the main characteristics of their implementations. METHODS: Four databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ERIC) were systematically searched following PRISMA guidelines. After screening 5554 articles, two independent reviewers assessed full texts, and 26 studies were included and systematically coded for narrative synthesis. RESULTS: The study results indicate that IGPs consistently improve mental health, social inclusion, and community cohesion and reduce ageism for both age groups. Most studies (77 %) reported positive outcomes for both generations, while 19 % showed benefits exclusively for older adults. Interventions are diverse, including educational, community, meaningful activity, physical activity, reminiscence, and technology programs. Relational dynamics (61.5 %) and ageism reduction (54 %) emerged as primary outcome focuses. CONCLUSIONS: Despite these strengths, variability in theoretical frameworks and methods limits comparability. These findings highlight the potential of IGPs to promote intergenerational solidarity and suggest that future research should prioritize standardized approach and balanced evaluations to strengthen the evidence base and guide effective practice in an aging society.