alles over ongeneeslijke ziektes

Living longer in good health

Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Interventions in Faith-Based Settings: A Systematic Review Using the Reach, Effectiveness/Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance Framework.

5 Repeated evidence

How much this weighs: several studies in people, combined — the strongest kind of evidence there is.
Type of study
meta-analysis or systematic review
Studied in
people
Participants
not stated in the abstract
Published
2021 in American journal of preventive medicine
Cited
13 times by other research
Who paid
Not declared. PubMed carries no conflict-of-interest statement for most articles; that is not the same as independent.
Source
PubMed 33341177 · doi 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.05.014
The plain-language write-up of this study is still being written. Below is the abstract exactly as the researchers published it.
Abstract by the researchers — original text

CONTEXT: Faith-based health interventions may improve obesity-related health behaviors, including healthy eating and physical activity. However, the generalizability of results and comprehensiveness of reporting for critical design elements sufficient for large-scale implementation and broad public health impact are unclear. This review assesses the degree to which faith-based healthy eating and physical activity programs report intervention elements using the reach, effectiveness/efficacy, adoption, implementation, maintenance framework. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search was initiated in June 2017, and updated searches concluded in December 2019. Articles were included if they (1) were published in an English language peer-reviewed journal, (2) were conducted in the U.S., (3) were interventions, (4) included individual-level healthy eating or physical activity behavioral outcomes, (5) were conducted within an organizational setting, and (6) were faith-based. Intervention elements were extracted, and comprehensiveness of reporting for intervention elements was assessed according to reach, effectiveness/efficacy, adoption, implementation, maintenance domains. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 38 interventions (46 articles) met the inclusion criteria. Most were conducted at the individual/interpersonal level (66%); few included additional elements of policy or environmental change (34%). Most interventions showed favorable changes in at least 1 health behavior outcome. No intervention addressed all reach, effectiveness/efficacy, adoption, implementation, maintenance indicators. The mean level of reporting was low for all reach, effectiveness/efficacy, adoption, implementation, maintenance dimensions (reach: 2.3 of 5 [SD=1.0] indicators, efficacy/effectiveness: 2.3 of 4 [SD=0.8] indicators, adoption: 3.7 of 6 [SD=1.4] indicators, implementation: 1.3 of 3 [SD=0.6] indicators, maintenance: 0.3 of 3 [SD=0.5] indicators). CONCLUSIONS: Studies reporting outcomes of faith-based interventions to improve healthy eating/physical activity behaviors lack the information necessary to understand the potential for broad dissemination and implementation in community settings. Future studies should report on the considerations for the translation and dissemination of evidence-based programs to expand public health impact.