cosa è effettivamente provato sul corpo femminile dopo i quaranta

Sonno, energia e cervello

Mindfulness-based therapy for insomnia for older adults with sleep difficulties: a randomized clinical trial.

4 Grande trial controllato

Quanto pesa questo: uno studio controllato in persone, abbastanza grande da significare qualcosa.
Tipo di studio
studio controllato
Studiato in
persone
Partecipanti
127
Pubblicato
2023 in Psychological medicine
Citato
21 volte da altre ricerche
Chi ha pagato
Non dichiarato. PubMed non riporta una dichiarazione di conflitto di interessi per la maggior parte degli articoli; questo non è la stessa cosa che indipendente.
Fonte
PubMed 34193328 · doi 10.1017/S0033291721002476
La spiegazione in linguaggio semplice di questo studio è ancora in corso di redazione. Di seguito è riportato l'abstract esattamente come pubblicato dai ricercatori.
Abstract dei ricercatori — testo originale

OBJECTIVE: Poor sleep is a modifiable risk factor for multiple disorders. Frontline treatments (e.g. cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia) have limitations, prompting a search for alternative approaches. Here, we compare manualized Mindfulness-Based Therapy for Insomnia (MBTI) with a Sleep Hygiene, Education, and Exercise Program (SHEEP) in improving subjective and objective sleep outcomes in older adults. METHODS: We conducted a single-site, parallel-arm trial, with blinded assessments collected at baseline, post-intervention and 6-months follow-up. We randomized 127 participants aged 50-80, with a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score ⩾5, to either MBTI ( n = 65) or SHEEP ( n = 62), both 2 hr weekly group sessions lasting 8 weeks. Primary outcomes included PSQI and Insomnia Severity Index, and actigraphy- and polysomnography-measured sleep onset latency (SOL) and wake after sleep onset (WASO). RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis showed reductions in insomnia severity in both groups [MBTI: Cohen's effect size d = -1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.61 to -0.89; SHEEP: d = -0.69, 95% CI -0.96 to -0.43], with significantly greater improvement in MBTI. Sleep quality improved equivalently in both groups (MBTI: d = -1.19; SHEEP: d = -1.02). No significant interaction effects were observed in objective sleep measures. However, only MBTI had reduced WASO actigraphy (MBTI: d = -0.30; SHEEP: d = 0.02), SOL actigraphy (MBTI: d = -0.25; SHEEP: d = -0.09), and WASO PSG (MBTI: d = -0.26; SHEEP ( d = -0.18). There was no change in SOL PSG . No participants withdrew because of adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: MBTI is effective at improving subjective and objective sleep quality in older adults, and could be a valid alternative for persons who have failed or do not have access to standard frontline therapies.