alles over ongeneeslijke ziektes

Skin aging

Topical nanoencapsulated cannabidiol cream as an innovative strategy combating UV-A-induced nuclear and mitochondrial DNA injury: A pilot randomized clinical study.

3 Small study in people

What this means for you: first signals, nothing more.
Type of study
controlled trial
Studied in
people
Participants
not stated in the abstract
Published
2024 in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Cited
9 times by other research
Who paid
Not declared. PubMed carries no conflict-of-interest statement for most articles; that is not the same as independent.
Source
PubMed 39025264 · doi 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.06.088
The plain-language write-up of this study is still being written. Below is the abstract exactly as the researchers published it.
Abstract by the researchers — original text

BACKGROUND: UV-A radiation contributes to photoaging/photocarcinogenesis by generating inflammation and oxidative damage. Current photoprotective strategies are limited by the availability/utilization of UV-A filters, highlighting an unmet need. Cannabidiol (CBD), having anti-inflammatory/antioxidant properties via regulation of nuclear erythroid 2-related factor, heme oxygenase 1, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, could potentially mitigate damage from UV-A exposure. OBJECTIVE/METHODS: This is a prospective, single-center, pilot clinical trial (NCT05279495). Nineteen participants applied nano-CBD (nCBD) or vehicle (VC) cream to randomized, blinded buttock sites twice daily for 14 days; then, the treated sites were irradiated with ≤3× UV-A minimal erythema dose. After 24 hours, punch biopsies were obtained for histology, immunohistochemistry, and real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: At 24 hours, 21% of participants had less observed erythema on CBD-treated skin than on VC skin. Histologically, nCBD-treated skin had reduced UV-A-induced epidermal hyperplasia than VC (P = .01). Immunohistochemistry detected reduced cytoplasmic/nuclear 8-oxoguanine glycosylase 1 staining in nCBD-treated skin compared with VC (P < .01). Quantitative mtDNA polymerase chain reaction demonstrated that UV-A-induced deletion of ND4 (proxy:4977 bp deletion; P = .003) and ND1 (proxy:3895 bp deletion; P = .002) was significantly reduced by in vivo nCBD treatment compared with VC. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size is this study's limitation. CONCLUSION: Topically applied nCBD cream reduced UV-A-induced formation of a frequent mutagenic nuclear DNA base lesion and protected against mtDNA mutations associated with UV-A-induced skin aging. To our knowledge, this trial is the first to identify UV-protective capacity of CBD-containing topicals in humans.