alles over ongeneeslijke ziektes

Hair and nails

Comparison of three strip harvesting technqiues (Haber's, Pathomvanich's and Ahmad's techniques).

3 Small study in people

What this means for you: first signals, nothing more.
Type of study
controlled trial
Studied in
people
Participants
10
Published
2020 in Journal of cosmetic dermatology
Cited
1 times by other research
Who paid
Not declared. PubMed carries no conflict-of-interest statement for most articles; that is not the same as independent.
Source
PubMed 30033681 · doi 10.1111/jocd.12711
The plain-language write-up of this study is still being written. Below is the abstract exactly as the researchers published it.
Abstract by the researchers — original text

BACKGROUND: To compare the three techniques, that is, using tissue spreader, using skin hooks technique, and using sharp scissor techniques. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized study was conducted in 10 patients undergoing hair transplant surgery by strip harvest after informed consent. The marked strip was divided into 3 equal parts to be assigned randomly to one of the harvesting techniques, that is, (a) using tissue spreader technique (A), (b) using skin hooks technique (B), and (c) using sharp scissor technique (C). The total number of hair of the strip margins were counted. The number of transected hair were also counted. The time taken for harvesting for each technique was noted. All the data were analyzed using ANOVA test. RESULTS: The average length of the strip was 27.8 cm. The mean harvesting time was 46.2 seconds (technique A), 174.5 seconds (technique B), and 49.9 seconds (technique C) (P < 0.05). The total hair density was 640.9 vs 664.5 vs 690.0, respectively. The total transection rate was 2.822 vs 2.689 vs 2.465 in technique A, B, and C, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sharp scissor technique is a safe technique which results in lower transection rate and no significant increase in operation time.