alles over ongeneeslijke ziektes

Skin aging

Atrophic and hypertrophic photoaging: Clinical, histologic, and molecular features of 2 distinct phenotypes of photoaged skin.

3 Small study in people

What this means for you: first signals, nothing more.
Type of study
cohort study
Studied in
people
Participants
not stated in the abstract
Published
2019 in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Cited
29 times by other research
Who paid
Not declared. PubMed carries no conflict-of-interest statement for most articles; that is not the same as independent.
Source
PubMed 30954583 · doi 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.03.081
The plain-language write-up of this study is still being written. Below is the abstract exactly as the researchers published it.
Abstract by the researchers — original text

BACKGROUND: Exposure to the sun causes premature skin aging, known as photoaging. Clinical features of photoaging vary widely among individuals. In one form, skin appears thin with telangiectasia, and in another form, skin appears thickened with coarse wrinkles. Etiologic, clinical, and therapeutic distinctions among different forms of photoaging remain largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical, histologic, and molecular features of hypertrophic and atrophic photoaging. METHODS: In total, 53 individuals were clinically classified as having primarily atrophic or hypertrophic photoaging or neither (controls). Participants' demographic and sun exposure-related lifestyle data were captured by questionnaire. Fifteen clinical features of participants were qualitatively or quantitively scored. Facial biopsies were analyzed for gene expression and histologic characteristics. RESULTS: Actinic and seborrheic keratosis, telangiectasia, and prior incidence of skin cancers were statistically significantly greater and photoaging scale severity, coarse wrinkles, thickness, and sallowness were significantly reduced in atrophic versus hypertrophic groups. Histology also revealed significantly less elastotic material in atrophic photoaging. Gene expression of matrix metalloproteinases and collagens did not differ between the 2 forms of photoaging. LIMITATIONS: The study was not designed to identify other possible subtypes of photoaging. CONCLUSION: Systematic, categorical, and quantitative clinical and histologic assessments distinguish atrophic and hypertrophic photoaging.