cosa è effettivamente provato sul corpo femminile dopo i quaranta

Invecchiamento della pelle

Comparison of 1064-nm and Dual-Wavelength (532/1064-nm) Picosecond-Domain Nd:YAG Lasers in the Treatment of Facial Photoaging: A Randomized Controlled Split-Face Study.

3 Piccolo studio in persone

Quanto pesa questo: ricerca in persone, ma piccola o senza un gruppo di controllo.
Tipo di studio
studio controllato
Studiato in
persone
Partecipanti
non dichiarato nel abstract
Pubblicato
2022 in Lasers in surgery and medicine
Citato
10 volte da altre ricerche
Chi ha pagato
Non dichiarato. PubMed non riporta una dichiarazione di conflitto di interessi per la maggior parte degli articoli; questo non è la stessa cosa che indipendente.
Fonte
PubMed 33783878 · doi 10.1002/lsm.23404
La spiegazione in linguaggio semplice di questo studio è ancora in corso di redazione. Di seguito è riportato l'abstract esattamente come pubblicato dai ricercatori.
Abstract dei ricercatori — testo originale

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of 1064-nm and dual-wavelength (532/1064 nm) picosecond Nd:YAG lasers with a holographic optic in the treatment of facial photoaging. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, randomized split-face study, each half of each participant's face was randomly treated with a 1064-nm or 532/1064-nm picosecond laser. All participants underwent five treatment sessions and follow-up visits 1 and 3 months after the final treatment. The primary outcomes were measured as the global photoaging scores, determined by two physicians who were blinded to the treatments. The secondary outcomes were the participant-assessed Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) and satisfaction scores. Histopathological examinations were performed. RESULTS: Global photoaging scores decreased significantly after treatment with either laser. The global photoaging scores, GAIS scores, and satisfaction scores did not differ significantly between the 1064-nm and 532/1064-nm picosecond laser treatments. Histological changes were similar between the two groups. Intraepidermal vacuoles and dermal hemorrhaging were observed immediately and 24 h after treatment. After five treatments, neocollagenesis was observed in the upper dermis of both groups, and elastic fibers were more elongated and orderly. CONCLUSIONS: Treatments with 1064-nm and 532/1064-nm picosecond Nd:YAG lasers were comparably effective at improving photodamaged facial skin by remodeling the collagen and elastin network through laser-induced optical degradation and vascular damage.