alles over ongeneeslijke ziektes

Menopause and hormones

A systematic review of heart rate variability and menopausal vasomotor symptoms.

5 Repeated evidence

What this means for you: this is established.
Type of study
meta-analysis or systematic review
Studied in
people
Participants
not stated in the abstract
Published
2026 in Physiological reports
Cited
0 times by other research
Who paid
Publicly funded, as far as was declared.
Source
PubMed 42121335 · doi 10.14814/phy2.70907
The plain-language write-up of this study is still being written. Below is the abstract exactly as the researchers published it.
Abstract by the researchers — original text

The menopausal transition is associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are highly prevalent during this period, potentially due to autonomic nervous system (ANS) changes. This systematic review examines whether heart rate variability (HRV), a noninvasive marker of autonomic function, differs between women with and without VMS. Five databases were searched. Studies were included if they assessed HRV in women with and without VMS while in peri- and/or post-menopause. Means, standard deviations, and sample sizes were extracted. Pooled standardized mean differences were calculated using a random-effects model with restricted maximum likelihood estimation. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane's Q and I 2 statistics. Three studies were suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled analysis revealed no difference in low frequency (LF) in women with VMS compared to those without VMS (Difference in means: 2.715 [95% CI: -0.124 to 5.555]; p = 0.06). There were no group differences in high frequency (HF) (p = 0.11). High heterogeneity was observed in both LF (Q = 73.96, p < 0.001, I 2 = 97%) and HF (Q = 61.82, p < 0.001, I 2 = 97%). Women with VMS and without VMS did not show differences in HRV. Larger, standardized studies are needed to better understand the relationship between autonomic function, VMS, and CVD risk.