alles over ongeneeslijke ziektes

Living longer in good health

Pro-inflammatory fatty acid profile and colorectal cancer risk: A Mendelian randomisation analysis.

5 Repeated evidence

What this means for you: this is established.
Type of study
meta-analysis or systematic review
Studied in
people
Participants
not stated in the abstract
Published
2017 in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
Cited
51 times by other research
Who paid
Publicly funded, as far as was declared.
Source
PubMed 28829991 · doi 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.034
The plain-language write-up of this study is still being written. Below is the abstract exactly as the researchers published it.
Abstract by the researchers — original text

BACKGROUND: While dietary fat has been established as a risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC), associations between fatty acids (FAs) and CRC have been inconsistent. Using Mendelian randomisation (MR), we sought to evaluate associations between polyunsaturated (PUFA), monounsaturated (MUFA) and saturated FAs (SFAs) and CRC risk. METHODS: We analysed genotype data on 9254 CRC cases and 18,386 controls of European ancestry. Externally weighted polygenic risk scores were generated and used to evaluate associations with CRC per one standard deviation increase in genetically defined plasma FA levels. RESULTS: Risk reduction was observed for oleic and palmitoleic MUFAs (OR OA = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.65-0.92, P = 3.9 × 10 -3 ; OR POA = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15-0.84, P = 0.018). PUFAs linoleic and arachidonic acid had negative and positive associations with CRC respectively (OR LA = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.98, P = 3.7 × 10 -4 ; OR AA = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.07, P = 1.7 × 10 -4 ). The SFA stearic acid was associated with increased CRC risk (OR SA = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01-1.35, P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Results from our analysis are broadly consistent with a pro-inflammatory FA profile having a detrimental effect in terms of CRC risk.