ce qui est réellement prouvé sur le corps féminin après quarante ans

Vieillissement de la peau

Efficacité et sécurité de l'acide poly-L-lactique pour le rajeunissement du tiers inférieur du visage : une évaluation contrôlée en demi-visage de 12 mois avec imagerie 3D et résultats rapportés par les patients.

3 Petite étude chez l'humain

L'importance de ce poids : recherche chez les personnes, mais petit ou sans groupe de comparaison.
Type d'étude
essai contrôlé
Étudié chez
des personnes
Participants
non indiqué dans le résumé
Publié
2026 dans le journal Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Cité
3 fois par d'autres recherches
Qui a payé
Non déclaré. PubMed ne contient pas de déclaration de conflit d'intérêts pour la plupart des articles ; ce n'est pas la même chose qu'indépendant.
Source
PubMed 41662390 · doi 10.1093/asj/sjag039
La version en langage simple de cette étude est toujours en cours de rédaction. Voici le résumé exactement tel que les chercheurs l'ont publié.
Résumé par les chercheurs — texte original

BACKGROUND: Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) is a biostimulatory injectable that restores midfacial volume through collagen neogenesis rather than gel-based filling. Controlled clinical evidence directly quantifying PLLA's volumetric efficacy remains limited. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of a Norberg Medical PLLA formulation for midface rejuvenation in a prospective, evaluator-blinded, split-face controlled study. Participants were enrolled between July 2024 and September 2024, with follow-up completed in September 2025. METHODS: Ninety-five patients underwent three standardized PLLA sessions on one hemiface and saline placebo on the contralateral side. Each vial contained 150 mg PLLA in spherical microparticles, reconstituted with 5 mL sterile water without lidocaine. Assessments included Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), Vectra H1 3D volumetry (malar, zygomatic, mandibular), FACE-Q, and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Two blinded evaluators rated WSRS. Statistical analysis included paired testing, responder rates (≥1-grade WSRS improvement), and inter-rater reliability (ICC). RESULTS: At 12 months, PLLA-treated sides showed significant WSRS reduction vs baseline and saline control (Δ = -0.68, P < .001). 3D analysis confirmed sustained volumetric enhancement across all midface subunits. Inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.91), and 82.1% achieved ≥1-grade WSRS improvement. Patient satisfaction remained high, mirroring objective findings. Adverse events were mild and transient, with no granulomas, nodules, or vascular events recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Controlled split-face evaluation demonstrated that standardized PLLA treatment yields measurable, long-lasting midfacial volume restoration with excellent safety and high patient satisfaction. No granulomas or delayed-onset nodules were observed in this 12-month, 95-patient cohort, supporting a favorable safety profile for this PLLA formulation under these study conditions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 (THERAPEUTIC): For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.