ce qui est réellement prouvé sur le corps féminin après quarante ans

Vieillissement de la peau

Revue systématique du plasma riche en plaquettes et de la fibrine riche en plaquettes dans le rajeunissement facial.

5 Preuves répétées

L'importance de ceci : plusieurs études chez des personnes, combinées — le type de preuve le plus solide qui existe.
Type d'étude
méta-analyse ou revue systématique
Étudié chez
des personnes
Participants
514
Publié
2025 in Annals of plastic surgery
Cité
2 fois par d'autres recherches
Qui a payé
Non déclaré. PubMed ne contient pas de déclaration de conflit d'intérêts pour la plupart des articles ; ce n'est pas la même chose qu'indépendant.
Source
PubMed 40167104 · doi 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004267
La version en langage simple de cette étude est toujours en cours de rédaction. Voici le résumé exactement tel que les chercheurs l'ont publié.
Résumé par les chercheurs — texte original

BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) are promising treatments for facial rejuvenation, leveraging growth factors to stimulate natural tissue repair and regeneration. Despite their growing popularity, their effectiveness remains controversial, with studies yielding mixed results. This systematic review evaluates the current evidence on PRP/PRF therapies and their effect on the following 6 key parameters of facial aging: wrinkles, texture, dyschromia, elasticity, skin thickness, and hydration. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and case series published after 2010. Eligible studies included more than 5 patients, evaluated PRP or PRF as monotherapy, and addressed at least 1 of the 6 listed parameters of facial aging. Articles were screened by 2 independent investigators and scored for quality of evidence using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine hierarchy. RESULTS: Twenty articles, comprising 514 patients, met inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies compared PRP/PRF to a control or baseline, while 4 compared them to alternative treatments. Wrinkles and fine lines (n = 16) were the most frequently studied parameters, followed by dyschromia (n = 12), texture (n = 11), elasticity (n = 6), skin thickness (n = 5), and hydration (n = 4). Significant improvements following PRP/PRF treatment were reported in 80% of studies on skin thickness, 75% on elasticity, 40% on wrinkles, 33% on texture, 17% on dyschromia, and 0% on hydration. Skin dyschromia had the highest proportion of studies reporting mixed findings (41.7%), whereas skin hydration had the highest proportion of studies reporting no improvement (67%). Additionally, all studies evaluating patient satisfaction reported significant improvements from pretreatment to posttreatment. No serious adverse events were reported in any of the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review identified skin thickness and elasticity as the facial aging parameters with the strongest evidence of improvement following PRP/PRF treatment, while skin hydration showed the weakest.